The recent discussion of Form Validation – How do you do it? , had me wondering just what might be involved in creating an easy to use validation framework. It’s a task that might seem easy, but when you get down to all the special cases it’s anything but. ColdFusion is a language designed around rapid development, so why not attempt to create a Validation framework modeled around the idea that new rules can be added easily?
Ok, that’s probably the case with any such framework, but it should be easy for a dynamic here. Today I’m mostly just brainstorming what I’d want and possible implementations. Over the next few days I’ll try to implement this. So what should it be able to do? Well, Jeff’s post stated some very important requirements that I’d say are all must haves. To reiterate some of the points though, it should be able to validate entire business objects (cfcs with getters/setters OR named structs), it should be able to have a “strict” mode where it validates everything or a mode where only set fields are validated.
It should be able to validate forms via ajax (funcational validation), as well as single fields via ajax. It should also be able to validate from the client side and return error messages (json/html) or validate on the server side and get back some sort of error collection. We want this to be as easy to use as possible, so the validation rules should only exist in a single place.
Here’s what I’m talking about.
First Name Username Email
This basic form would be the basis for how the front end would work. Based on the metadata we’re marking up on the form (namely those “validate” attributes). The idea is that a form has basic validation rules associated with it — when to validate it and where to put the return values.
Each field in the form would then inherit the validation rules defined in the form, but could also overwrite them. For instance, this form would validate everything on submit by default, and place and error messages “before” the field they’re for. Other options might include “after”, “top” or “bottom” for the very top of the form, or “above” and “below” for errors to be put at the top of the current grouping.
The HTML will require some kind of hooks for where to place these messages of course, which is where some the convention markup comes into place. The before/after messages would look for the formid-fieldid-field element and place it in an element before that.
Top/Bottom would look for the formid and place based on that, and the grouping option would look for an element with the class of group that’s a parent element.
Now how would this know where to submit to for validation? That’s another easy convention to handle. Let say there’s three possible things that can be validated via ajax on a form- – an entire form, a single object from a form or a single field from a form.
Creating URLs for these to submit to might end up with something like this: http://localhost/validate (validate.index) http://localhost/validate/object (validate.object?object=objName) http://localhost/validate/object/field (validate.field?object=objName&field=fieldName)
object\[field\] which is a Ruby on Rails/ColdFusion on Wheels convention.
Did you link to this article? Add it here and I'll include it!